Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield, MA.

Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield is a grassroots organization dedicated to stopping a proposed biomass incinerator in Springfield MA.

http://www.springfieldincinerator.info/


The following groups have joined Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield to oppose this incinerator: Massachusetts Medical Society, Hampden District Medical Society, American Lung Association, Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition, Pioneer Valley Asthma Coalition, Toxics Action Center, Arise for Social Justice, Greater Springfield chapter of the Massachusetts Senior Action Council, Western Massachusetts American Friends Service Committee, Connecticut River Watershed Council, Conservation Law Foundation, Massachusetts Environmental Energy Alliance, The McKnight Neighborhood Youth Council, East Forest Park Civic Association, Physicians for Social Responsibility/Pioneer Valley.

October 19 2010 - Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield has just received notice that Epsilon Associates is planning to change its fuel from mostly construction and demolition debris to waste wood chips at its proposed Springfield facility! Although PRE's change is a testament to our hard work, this change requires immediate action on all of our parts at the state and local levels. Below is the link to the developer's Notice of Project Change document for your review:
http://www.springfieldincinerator.info/content_downloads/Submittal%209-30-2010%20Notice%20of%20Project%20Change.pdf

Our Position

No incineration in Springfield! Springfield does not need another polluting plant. The state and the city should abandon all incineration and support clean, safe alternatives and industry in order to protect public health. Springfield is an environmental justice community and a health-impaired community with asthma and respiratory illness rates nearly double those of the rest of the state. The switch to wood waste is still dirty and a danger to public health. Emissions from this incinerator will include the same amount of particulate matter 2.5 and 10, the same amount of VOC's, the same amount of SO2, same amount of NP3 and almost the same amount of HAPs. The plant will still emit arsenic, mercury and lead. There will be more truck trips - 140 per day - using heavier trucks to accomodate a larger amount of fuel - now 1,184 tons per day. No burning! Not this either!

We Need to Act Now

After giving Palmer unlimited time to craft their application to change fuel, the state gives the public only 20 days to comment on a more than 300 page document. We need more time to ensure that everyone’s voices are heard! Comment deadline is October 26. This project does not require a Beneficial Use Determination by the state, it does not require an Environmental Impact Report unless MEPA decides on this step, and it does not require a public hearing for an air permit from Department of Environmental Protection unless DEP decides on one. We need you and your members to comment on this proposal to ensure that an Environmental Impact Report for the region is required and to ensure that the DEP holds public hearings on this project. Without your comments by 10/26, we could lose our chance to stop this project.


Why The Rush? Can We Trust This Developer?

Epsilon openly states in its Notice of Change that is needs to start building by July 2011 to avoid new EPA clean air regulations:

3.1.2 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
PSD review is a federally mandated program for review of new major sources of criteria pollutants or major modifications to existing sources. For PSD purposes, a biomass fired boiler facility is a major source if emissions of any regulated pollutant are greater than 250 tpy. The Facility will not emit greater than 250 tpy of the criteria pollutants NOx, SO2, VOC, CO, and PM10 and therefore is not subject to PSD review. According to the PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, issued May 13, 2010, PSD would apply to new construction projects emitting more than 100,000 tpy of GHG emissions started after July 1, 2011. PRE plans to begin construction before July 1, 2011, so PSD would not apply.


What they are saying here is, although EPA is going to start regulating CO2 as a pollutant, and even biogenic CO2, they are going to evade this because they plan on starting construction before the implementation date. Obviously Epsilon Associates needs to fast-track their incineration proposal to make it happen. Palmer has already proven they are untrustworthy; last month, the state fined them $27,000 for violating provisions in their air quality permits and hazardous waste management requirements at its paving operation. Palmer was also caught dumping waste water into the ground.

In addition, their proposal claims this incinerator will be carbon-neutral because it will use nonforest wood material. This woody biomass, however, is already claimed by other users. If they take away this woody biomass from current users, more trees will have to be cut to ensure the current supply. So how can this incinerator call itself carbon-neutral if it will harm our forest resources and landscape by ultimately requiring the cutting of forest land, as the Manomet Study has already made clear. And what happens when there is no longer enough woody biomass? Biomass plants in NH are now suing each other over dwindling wood reserves, and most "wood chip" biomass plants in Maine have converted to construction and demolition incinerators because of low fuel stock. Should we expect the same to happen in Springfield with another simple permit change?


================================

The Project: Palmer Renewable Energy proposes to build a 35-megawatt power-generating incinerator at 1000 Page Boulevard, Springfield. Each day, over 1000 tons of the wood will be burned, generating only 1/3 of 1% of Massachusetts' total power production.

Health Issues: In an unexpected and unusual move, The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH) has responded to a request by members of Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield (STIS) and issued a letter of comment relating to the Springfield wood waste incinerator's Beneficial Use Determination (BUD) permit. This permit reclassifies the wood waste, declaring it suitable for fuel. The focus of the DPH letter is the lack of a health impact assessment (HIA), something the DPH feels is called for by the BUD regulations.

The Massachusetts Medical Society, an organization representing 20,000 Massachusetts physicians, has voiced their opposition to biomass incineration in general. In the first paragraph of their press release they state: "On the grounds that biomass power plants pose an unacceptable risk to the public's health by increasing air pollution, the Massachusetts Medical Society has adopted a policy opposing three currently proposed large-scale biomass power plants in Massachusetts and urging state government to adopt policies to minimize the approval and construction of new biomass plants."

The Hampden District Medical Society voted unanimously to formally oppose this plant because it presents "an unacceptable public health risk."

The Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition is also formally opposed to this plant as stated in their letter: "The Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition (MBCC) is the largest breast cancer organization in the state representing over 10,000 members. MBCC is dedicated to challenging all obstacles to the eradication of breast cancer. In particular, MBCC is concerned about the link between environmental toxins and the extremely high rate of breast cancer in the state and as a result, is in opposition to the burning of construction and demolition debris at the proposed Palmer Renewable Energy biomass plant."


The Physicians for Social Responsibility/Pioneer Valley oppose construction of incinerators in the valley. "It is the finding of the Physicians for Social Responsibility that the biomass power plants being proposed for several Pioneer Valley locations would contribute to particulate air pollution emissions in a region that already has pollution problems, and therefore we oppose the construction and operation of such plants."


Springfield air quality already receives a failing grade from the American Lung Association on many days of the year. American Lung Association of Massachusetts opposes this incinerator and explains why in a recent press release: "For years, the ALAMA has viewed biomass burning as a significant source of air pollution. We believe that the plants proposed in Massachusetts will create an unnecessary risk to both our state's health and air quality and are particularly concerned by inefficient and dirty sources of power located in communities that already suffer from poor air quality and high asthma rates."

Hampden County is already overburdened with lead pollution. According to the latest EPA figures, Hampden County sources emit 10,461 pounds of lead per year, which is 25% of the state's total.

EPA lead chart:

Effects on Our Children: The children of Hampden County are already suffering from this level of lead exposure with blood lead levels nearly double the state average. Lead can accumulate in bone and cause neurological impairment, developmental problems for children including loss of IQ, hearing impairment, delayed growth and behavior disorders. Researchers for the first time have linked air-pollution exposure before birth with lower IQ scores in childhood, bolstering evidence that smog may harm the developing brain.

The state asthma rate for children continues to climb and is now at 10%, but the Springfield rate is more than 16%! In addition to the emissions from the incinerator, there would be the added exhaust fumes from upwards of 140 truck trips a day. There are 55 schools within a five mile radius of the proposed toxic incinerator. A new study shows that children who breathe traffic-related air pollution at school are more likely to develop asthma, even after taking into account levels of air pollution at their homes.

Schools within a five mile radius of the proposed PRE incinerator

Fallout region with area schools-see website.


Environmental Issues: Burning wood releases 50% more carbon dioxide per unit of energy produced than a coal fired plant.

Carbon dioxide emissions from this incinerator are exempt from regulations.

"The science is clear: global warming is happening faster than ever and humans are responsible. Global warming is caused by releasing what are called greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The most common greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide. Many of the activities we do every day like turn the lights on, cook food, or heat or cool our homes rely on energy sources like coal and oil and that emit carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases. This is a major problem because global warming destabilizes the delicate balance that makes life on this planet possible. Just a few degrees in temperature can completely change the world as we know it, and threaten the lives of millions of people around the world."

Click here to view the source on 350.org and to learn more about how adding more corbon dioxide to the atmosphere could be disastrous!-see website

http://www.springfieldincinerator.info/

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Webmaster: Please go to the Stop Toxic Incineration in Springfield website for more details, charts, and graphs. Please support the effort by this organization.